Md. Nazrul @ Md. Nazrul Haque @ Nazrul Haque @ Md. Najrunal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43852 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-609 Year-2023 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR DistrictPurnia ====================================================== 1.
Md. Nazrul @ Md. Nazrul Haque @ Nazrul Haque @ Md. Najrunal son of Md. Husain @ Husain Village- Santnagar Chanka W.No-3, K. Nagar DistPurnea 2.
Nisha @ Nisha Khatoon wife of Md. Nazrul @ Md. Nazrul Haque @ Nazrul Haque @ Md. Najrunal Village- Santnagar Chanka W.No-3, K. Nagar DistPurnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bimal Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with K. Nagar (Champanagar) P.S. Case No. 609 of 2023 dated 22.10.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 498(A), 341, 323, 504, 328, 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code was also added.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the coaccused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 2,00,000/- as dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43852 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 2/2 The petitioner no. 1 is the father-in-law and the petitioner no. 2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased and they have no concern with the alleged offence. It is further submitted that the petitioners neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the informant's daughter. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 31.03.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners abovenamed, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Purnea in connection with S.T. No. 186 of 2024/ CIS No. 186 of 2024 arising out of K. Nagar (Champanagar) P.S. Case No. 609 of 2023.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T