Munarik Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41533 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-506 Year-2020 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

MUNARIK SAHNI S/O JAGAN SAHNI Resident of Village- Chandsarai, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali.

2.

CHANARIK SAHNI S/O JAGAN SAHNI Resident of Village- Chandsarai, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali.

3.

DASHRATH KUMAR @ DASHRATH SHANI S/O UTTAM SAHNI Resident of Village- Chandsarai, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application against petitioner no. 3.

Permission is accorded.

This application is dismissed as withdrawn only against petitioner no. 2.

So far as rest of the petitioners are concerned, the instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Mahua P.S. Case no. 506 of 2020 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41533 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 2/3 384 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant reached near brahmsthan of his village, several accused persons including the petitioner with an intention to kill him, surrounded him and started to abuse and assault. It is further alleged that accused Amarjit Sahni snatched gold chain from his neck. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. Impugned order shows that injury received by the informant is simple. He has got no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 1 and 2 on bail. The petitioner no. 1 and 2 are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Mahua P.S. Case no. 506 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41533 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 3/3 the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U