Md. Jamrul @ Jamrul @ Jamarul Haque v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43928 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-609 Year-2023 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR DistrictPurnia ====================================================== 1.

Md. Jamrul @ Jamrul @ Jamarul Haque Son of Md. Husain R/O Vill.- Santnagar, Chanka Ward no. 3, P.S.- K. Nagar (Champanagar), Dist.- Purnea 2.

Nuhu @ Md. Nuhu Son of Md. Jamrul @ Jamrul @ Jamarul Haque R/O Vill.- Santnagar, Chanka Ward no. 3, P.S.- K. Nagar (Champanagar), Dist.- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar PATNA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimal Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with K. Nagar (Champanagar) P.S. Case No. 609 of 2023 dated 22.10.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/s 498A, 341, 323, 504, 328, 307, 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's daughter by administering poison to her due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 2 lakhs as dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are the cousin father-in-law and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43928 of 2024(3) dt.06-09-2024 2/2 cousin brother-in-law of the informant's daughter and they have no concern with the alleged offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The petitioners neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the informant's daughter. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the allegation being general and omnibus against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court concerned, Purnea in connection with K. Nagar (Champanagar) P.S. Case No. 609 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. This application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T