Patna High CourtCR. REV./426/2023dismissed

Manohar Pandit v. Pinki Devi

2025-01-20Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.426 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Supaul ====================================================== Manohar Pandit Son of Jivachh Pandit, Resident of Village -Parsauni, PsSupaul, Distt- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Pinki Devi Wife of Manohar Pandit, Resident of Village -Pathra, Ps- Pipra, Distt- Supaul ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Amar Nath Singh, Advocate Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER 20-01-2025 The instant revision is directed against an order of maintenance passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Supaul in Maintenance Case No.20 of 2020 on 19.07.2022 directing the petitioner to pay maintenance to the opposite party at the rate of Rs.6500/- per month from the date of filing of the application subject to adjustment of any amount which has been paid to her during the pendency of the case under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C.

2. Having heard learned Advocate on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Advocate on behalf of the opposite party and on careful perusal of the impugned order, I do not find any illegality or material irregularity for interference by this Court in revision with regard to the quantum of maintenance.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.426 of 2023(6) dt.20-01-2025 2/2

3. This Court is of the view that the present day of market price of essential commodities makes this Court to hold that the amount of maintenance is not at all excessive and the petitioner is under obligation to pay the same. As a result, the impugned order passed in Maintenance Case No.20 of 2020 on 19.07.2022 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Supaul is affirmed.

4. Accordingly, the instant criminal revision is dismissed on contest.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J) mdrashid/- U T