Amirul Miyan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41980 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2025 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1 .
Amirul Miyan S/o Haroon Miyan R/o Vill- Jaimangalpur, P.S.- Shikarpur, Distt- West Champaran, Bettiah 2.
Haroon Miyan S/o Late Anayat Miyan R/o Vill- Jaimangalpur, P.S.- Shikarpur, Distt- West Champaran, Bettiah 3 .
Anarul @ Anarul Miyan S/o Haroon Miyan R/o Vill- Jaimangalpur, P.S.- Shikarpur, Distt- West Champaran, Bettiah ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP For informant :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar , Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the pre-arrest bail petition of petitioner No. 1 .
2. Permission is accorded.
3 . This bail petition with respect to petitioner No. 1 is dismissed as withdrawn .
4. Heard learned counsel for petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 , informant and learned A.P.P. for the State .
5 . The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 103
(1) , 238 and 3 (5) of BNS.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41980 of 2025(4) dt.24-11-2025 2/3
6. As per prosecution case , daughter of informant was married with co-accused Nazarul Miyan about 7 years ago and after the marriage , she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by all the accused persons due to non-fulfillment of additional demand of dowry and ultimately these petitioners along with other accused persons committed the murder of informant's daughter.
7. Petitioner No. 2 is father-in -law and petitioner No. 3 is elder brother-in -law of deceased. Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and got no concern with the affairs of deceased and her husband. It is further orally submitted that thrust of accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody . Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 8 . Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as informant vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner.
9. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41980 of 2025(4) dt.24-11-2025 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate - First Class Bettiah , District-West Champaran in connection with Shikarpur Case No. 121 of 2025 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS 2023 . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T