Patna High CourtCWJC/9519/2015dismissed

Krishna Murari Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-11-09Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9519 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Krishna Murari Prasad son of Shri Ram Briksha Ram, resident of Bengala Asthan, Pahsi, P.O.- R.M.S., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Joint Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

5. The Deputy Secretary, (Press Establishment) Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

6. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

7. The Joint Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

8. The Deputy Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

9. The Director, the Directorate of Printing and Stationary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghwendra Sharan Pandey For the Respondent/s : Smt. Binita Singh, GP 31 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-11-2015 The stand of the State counsel on verification of the records of CWJC No.15444 of 2011 is correct that for identical relief, which is being sought in the present writ application, an I.A. has been filed in the previous writ application as well. Learned counsel appearing in the present writ application after verification of records accepts the position.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9519 of 2015 dt.09-11-2015 2/2 Therefore, there cannot be two parallel proceedings in relation to the same cause of action.

CWJC No.9519 of 2015 is dismissed with a caution and warning to the petitioner that such adventurism should not be resorted to in future. Otherwise, the Court will come down very heavily by imposing heavy cost on such litigants.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U