Ramashish Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24642 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -94 Year- 2000 Thana -KHIJARSARAI District- GAYA ====================================================== Ramashish Manjhi, Son of Bindeshwar Manshi, resident of Mohalla- Jharu, P.S.- Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Khizarsarai P.S.Case No.94 of 2000 registered for an offence under Section 395 of the IPC.

It appears that the petitioner was allowed bail by this Court on 22.06.2001 in Cr.Misc.No.14426 of 2001. After bail he left taking interest before the trial court and his bail was cancelled on 16.11.2002. The court below considering long misuse the privilege of bail has rejected the bail prayer of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 02.01.2018 by this time he must have learnt lesson of jumping out of the bail.

The learned APP opposed the submissions.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24642 of 2018 (3) dt.18-05-2018 2/2 prayer for bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of FTC-Ist, Gaya in connection with Sessions Trial No.343 of 2017/123 of 2014(S.J) arising out of Khizarsarai P.S.Case No.94 of 2000 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U