Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42977 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2024 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kumar S/o Naresh Yadav Resident of VillageChamardih, P.S- Chandauti, Dist- Gaya 2.
Rajeev Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar S/O Naresh Yadav Resident of VillageChamardih, P.S- Chandauti, Dist- Gaya 3.
Kiran Devi W/o Rajeev Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar Resident of VillageChamardih, P.S- Chandauti, Dist- Gaya 4.
Naresh Singh Yadav @ Naresh Yadav S/O Late Bhekhal Yadav @ Mekhan Singh Resident of Village- Chamardih, P.S- Chandauti, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.
2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in a case instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 303(2), 352, 351(2), (3), 3/5 of Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita.
2/4
3. As per the allegations made in the F.I.R., while the informant along with his family members was present at his house, in the meantime, petitioners, variously armed, arrived there and began abusing him. It is further alleged that they demanded a sum of ₹50,000 (fifty thousand rupees) from the informant. When the informant's mother intervened, the accused persons allegedly assaulted both the informant and his mother, causing them injuries. It is also alleged that the accused persons snatched a mobile phone from the possession of the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence as alleged. A bare perusal of the F.I.R. reveals that no offence under Section 110 of the B.N.S. is made out against the petitioners, as the injuries sustained by the injured persons are simple in nature. There is no specific
3/4 allegation attributed to the petitioners; rather, the allegation is general in nature, alleging that all the accused persons assaulted the informant and his mother. Furthermore, from a perusal of the injury report (annexed as Annexure P/2 series), it is evident that the injuries sustained by the injured persons are simple in nature and not inflicted on any vital part of the body.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Nimchak Bathani P.S. Case no. 236 of 2024, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
4/4 (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Nirajkrs/- U T