Ramjee Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50746 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -318 Year- 2015 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Ramjee Manjhi, Son of Mahabir Manjhi, Resident of VillageRupalichak, Sosari, P.S.- Gurua, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rashid Izhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 19.05.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. 12383 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 10.12.2015, there is no signature of the petitioner on the alleged seizure list, the petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. and, as such, he deserves sympathetic consideration, as other co-accused have already been allowed bail in this case and further up till now commitment of the case has not been done. The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50746 of 2016 (4) dt.15-03-2017 2/2 considering the detention of the petitioner now, he is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Sherghati (Dobi) P.S. Case No. 318 of 2015 (G.R. Case No. 1810 of 2015), subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T