Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37606 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2012 Thana -BARAHIYA District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Raushan Kumar Son of- Birendra Singh @ Lolu, Resident of VillageSahjadpur, P.S.- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 3.

27.04.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 139 of 2012 dated 21.12.2012 instituted under Sections 147/148/149/341/302/379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though as per the allegation by the informant, who is the uncle of the deceased, he along with others had taken away the deceased and had killed him but during investigation on the basis of scientific findings of C.D.R. call details, the informant could not have accompanied the deceased as the tower location of the mobile numbers of the deceased and the informant was almost 15 K.M. away since much before the time of the occurrence and also after that. It is submitted that an independent witness in Paragraph-76 of the case diary had stated that it was he who was accompanying the deceased and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37606 of 2014 (3) dt.27-04-2015 2/2 on the way four unknown persons had abducted him, which fact he had narrated to the brother of the informant and the informant at that time was not present and later the informant had come and tried to know about the incident from the said witness and the said witness had also stated the fact before the police. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P., upon going through the case diary, does not dispute the aforesaid position. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Barahiya P.S. Case No. 139 of 2012, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate or appear on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U T