Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39712 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2025 Thana- BOCHAHAN District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Ram S/o Late Sobhit Ram R/o vill - Gopalpur Gopal, P.S- Bochaha, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bochaha P.S. Case No. 73 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 76, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and her family members and outraged the modesty of informant's daughter.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39712 of 2025(2) dt.01-07-2025 2/2 the petitioner also submits that there is delay of five days in lodging the FIR. It is alleged that the petitioner gave an axe blow on the head of the informant due to which she sustained injuries. On perusal of the injury report, it appears that the injury received by the informant is simple in nature. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature of injury, case and counter case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bochaha P.S. Case No. 73 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T