Dinesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49882 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2021 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Dinesh Kumar Singh S/O Ram Swarth Singh Resident Of Village- Rain Shankar, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi. 2.

Ratnesh Kumar Singh S/O Ram Swarth Singh Resident Of Village- Rain Shankar, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi. 3.

Rita Devi S/O Dinesh Kumar Singh Resident Of Village- Rain Shankar, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. H.A. Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 447, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant, his father and mother due to which informant sustained serious injury over his head and his mother also got seriously injured.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49882 of 2021(4) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. There is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the fact that the injury found upon the victim is grievous in nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 176 of 2021.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T