← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52835/2016bail granted

Satto Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-06Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52835 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -494 Year- 2016 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Satto Yadav , Son of Late Tharu Yadav.

2. Ganesh Yadav, Son of Kripa Lal Yadav.

3. Sandeep Yadav, Son of Ganesh Yadav.

All are residents of Village - Jhitkiya, P.S. Ghailarh, DistrictMadhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------ 06-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Madhepura (Ghailarh O.P.) P.S. Case No.494 of 2016/G.R. Case No.1340 of 2016 registered under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that at the time of repairing of the house of the informant, the petitioners and one Shankar Yadav reached there and the petitioner Satto Yadav through Dabia and the petitioner Sandeep Yadav through rod caused injury at the head of the informant whereas the petitioner Ganesh Yadav through lathi

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52835 of 2016 (2) dt.06-12-2016 2/2 caused injuries at the back, arms and leg of the informant. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that, in fact, due to land dispute, the occurrence of "MaarPeet" took place in between the parties in which the informant and the petitioners' side also sustained injuries but due to ulterior motive, the informant has lodged this false case. Moreover, the injuries, as found on the person of the informant, are simple in nature. The petitioners have no criminal antecedents. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender by them within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura (Ghailarh O.P.) P.S. Case No.494 of 2016/G.R. No.1340 of 2016, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T