← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45698/2024bail rejected

Kartik Rai @ Nikhil Kumar @ Nikhil v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-06Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45698 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2024 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== 1.

Kartik Rai @ Nikhil Kumar @ Nikhil Son Of Babu Lal Bodo @ Babu Lal Bodho Village- Dharamganj, Ward No. 28, P.S.- Kishanganj, Distt.- Kishanganj 2.

Sunny Rai @ Shani Kumar @ Sanni Son Of Babu Lal Bodo @ Babu Lal Bodho Village- Dharamganj, Ward No. 28, P.S.- Kishanganj, Distt.- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 162 of 2024, Special Case No. 131 of 2024 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 353, 427, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 32, 34, 36, 41(1) and 45 of Bihar Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on April 28th, 2024 at around 11:30 AM, on a secret information, informant along with police officials arrived at the spot, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including these petitioners attacked police party, as a result of which,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45698 of 2024(2) dt.06-08-2024 2/2 some police officials were injured. It is further alleged that the accused persons also threatened to falsely implicate the team in cases of sexual assault. During a search of the house of these petitioners, 15.765 litres of illicit liquor has been recovered.

4. Considering the nature of accusation and the gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T