Pramanand Chouhan @ Parmanand Chouhan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39911 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2026 Thana- BARAHAT District- Banka ====================================================== Pramanand Chouhan @ Parmanand Chouhan S/O- Vishwanath Chouhan Resident of village-Haripur, PS-Barahat, District-Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(4), 109(1), 324(3), 303(2), 117(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 3/5 of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that on 09.03.2026 at 10:00 AM, the accused persons including the petitioner entered her house and started abusing, on objection, all accused assaulted by lathi causing injury on head of her father and also assaulted her mother by lathi injuring her. It is next alleges that Shankar, Rambha Devi, Vishwanath and Divya intend to forcefully capture her land, hence the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39911 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/3 occurrence was committed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is also submitted that the date of occurrence is 09.03.2026 and the FIR came to be instituted on 13.03.2026 i.e. after a delay of more than four days without any plausible explanation and even allegation of assault and abuse is not specific.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barahat P.S. Case No. 70 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39911 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 3/3
7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) rajesh/- U T