← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37953/2019bail rejected

Hazari Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-14Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37953 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-584 Year-2018 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== HAZARI SINGH Son of Late Ramashish Singh Resident of Village - Rauni, P.S.- Bikramganj, Dist.- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Bikramganj P. S. Case No. 584/2018, instituted for offences under Section(s) 341, 323, 324, 325, 302 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that on the date of occurrence petitioner along with co-accused Bhagwan Singh came to the door of informant and started abusing him claiming that they will cut the ridge of the paddy field. On hearing the accused persons, father of informant came and objected the accused persons. It is alleged that Bhagwan Singh brought Katta from his house and gave it to the petitioner. Thereafter petitioner opened fire on the chest of father of informant, who died on the spot.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37953 of 2019(4) dt.14-08-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for informant has submitted that in post-mortem report cause of death is opined due to firearm injury. Doctor has found one firearm injury on the person of deceased. Considering the fact that there is direct allegation against this petitioner of causing firearm injury to the father of informant, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of petitioner is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T