← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45096/2024allowed

Ramanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-07Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45096 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-356 Year-2019 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran ====================================================== RAMANAND YADAV SON OFSHIVBACHAN YADAV VILLAGEKOERIGAWA, P.S.-YOGAPTTI, DISTT.-WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhannjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 18, 20, 21, 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3.

As per the prosecution case, informant along with other police officials went to the shop of one Sunil Kumar and found one person sitting on a bicycle. One bag was hanging on his bicycle from which intoxicated substances were recovered. He was apprehended by the police and he disclosed the name of the petitioner as his associate.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45096 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 2/2 case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. It is submitted that police has filed final form (Annexure-3 of the bail petition) but the Court below differing with the final form took cognizance against the petitioner under the N.D.P.S. Act. The petitioner has two criminal antecedent and has been rotting in judicial custody since 14.05.2024.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No.356 of 2019.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T