Ranu Ranjan @ Rannu Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50235 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-372 Year-2021 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran ====================================================== RANU RANJAN @ RANNU RANJAN Son of Manoj Ranjan Singh Resident of Village - Marpa Mohan, P.S.- Fenhara, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 07.06.2021, is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation is of recovery of mobile, 12 ATM cards along with a live cartridge from the possession of the petitioner and from accused Naveen, arms and cartridges are alleged to have been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50235 of 2021(3) dt.25-04-2022 2/3 recovered along with a motorcycle.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, he has filed a supplementary affidavit bringing on record that the motorcycle and the mobile belongs to the petitioner. It is further submitted that though the police alleges that 12 ATM cards were recovered from his possession but only 4 ATM cards were recovered which belonged to the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that the police has falsely implicated the petitioner as would be evident from the fact that a live cartridge is alleged to have been recovered from his possession and cartridge without a gun in useless.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 07.06.2021, is a person with clean antecedent, chargesheet has been submitted in the case and taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50235 of 2021(3) dt.25-04-2022 3/3 pending/successor court in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 372 of 2021.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T