Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Nonia v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36532 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2017 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Nonia son of Sheonandan Nonia Resident of Village - Khulhariya, P.S. - Koilwar, District - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gopal Govind Mishra, Advocate For O.P. No. 2 :

Nitya Nand Tiwary, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 190 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 506, 307, 34 and added Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

Allegation against petitioner and other co-accused persons is of torturing her daughter for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and they ultimately pushed the daughter of informant from the roof and she suffered serious injuries. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36532 of 2018(5) dt.20-09-2018 2/2 case. It has been further submitted that There is no specific allegation against petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 17.03.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Ara, in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 190 of 2017 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T