Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.30226 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2013 Thana -JANDAHA District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================
1. Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Ram S/o Shiv Nath Ram, resident of Village- Ataulapur Jahanabad, Police Station- Lalganj, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Heard the parties.
This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Jandaha P.S.Case No.43 of 2013, for the offences punishable under Sections 395/412 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears from perusal of the F.I.R. that on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused, the petitioner has also been named in this case.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner and except one another case, he is not accused in any other case. Further submission is that the petitioner is in custody for about one year.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30226 of 2017 (3) dt.19-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and from perusal of the impugned order itself, it appears that the learned court below has disposed of his application with direction that if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months from the date of order, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail and the impugned order has been passed on 4.5.2017, as such 2 1⁄2 months has already crossed.
In such view of the matter, the learned trial court is further directed to conclude the trial within a period of three months and if not concluded, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail, which will be considered positively considering his custody and the allegation, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U