Raushan Ara @ Roksana Khatun v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49348 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2023 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== RAUSHAN ARA @ ROKSANA KHATUN W/O- MANZUR ALAM @ MANZUR MIYA VILLAGE- BHAWANANDPUR, P.S.- BIRPUR, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Sameer For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by order dated 08.08.2024, case diary along with the injury report was called for, but then only case diary has been received.
4. The Court will not wait endlessly for the injury report.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that Fazil Miya assaulted her by an iron
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49348 of 2024(3) dt.06-09-2024 2/3 rod on her back, thereafter Manzur Miya assaulted Khairu Nisha on her head by an iron rod causing injury and she became unconscious, further Sittu Miya assaulted Begum Khatoon by an iron rod injuring her finger of left and right hand, thereafter named accused persons including the petitioner assaulted the informant and Ladli Khatoon and snatched gold chain of Begum Khatoon, it is also alleged that the occurrence took place on account of dispute relating to land.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case by the informant. It is also submitted that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against her.
7. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Birpur P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49348 of 2024(3) dt.06-09-2024 3/3 No. 230 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
9. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T