Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39840/2019bail rejected

Md. Suraj @ Waliazam v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-27Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39840 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2018 Thana- BAKHTIARPUR District- Saharsa ====================================================== MD. SURAJ @ WALIAZAM, Son of Late Md. Mannan, Resident of VillageSitanabad South Ward No. 8, P.S.- Bakhtiarpur, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rashid Izhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 27-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No.258 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302, 384, 504 and 506 Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa.

There is specific allegation in the written report that the petitioner gave dagger blow to brother of the informant in his abdomen and chest on account of which he died. Case diary has been received, wherein, postmortem report is available. The doctor has found sharp cut injury on the chest and abdomen of the deceased, which supports the allegation in the written report.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39840 of 2019(3) dt.27-08-2019 2/2 Therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is rejected at this stage.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 20.09.2018.

The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same as early as possible, preferably, within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Liberty is given to the petitioner to renew his prayer after nine months in the event trial is not concluded within aforesaid period.

(Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T