Patna High CourtCWJC/9374/2015dismissed

Tara Nand Mishra And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-04-22Mr. Justice Mungeshwar Sahoo2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9374 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Tara Nand Mishra

2. Ram Priti Mishra Both sons of late Bindeshwari Mishra

3. Praveen Mishra Son of Sri Ram Priti Mishra All resident of villagePokhram, P.S.- Biraul, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Collector, Darbhanga P.O. Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga.

3. The Circle Officer, Biroul P.O.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga. null null

4. Soni Devi, wife of Sri Kameshwar Prasad Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Pokhram, Uttari, P.O.- Pokhram, Circle- BIroul, District- Darbhanga. null null

5. Umesh Chandra Jha, Son of Sri Ram Prasad Jha Panchayat Razgar Sevak, Gram Panchayat Raj Pokhram, Uttari, P.O.- Pokhram, Circle- Biroul District- Darbhanga.

6. Dilip Singh, son of Sri Mahesh Singh, Circle Amin (Extended Period of Service) Circle- Biroul, P.O.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga.

7. Sanjeeva Kumar, Son of Sri Ramesh Kumar, P.O. of MANREGA, Circle & P.O.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga.

8. Anand Mohan Mishra son of Late Bindeshwari Mishra

9. Sahjanand Mishra son of Late Padam Kant Mishra, Both resident of village & P.O.- Pokhram, P.S.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioners : Mr. Abinash Kumar For the Respondents : Mr. Ajit Pratap Singh- Sc15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER 22-04-2016 Heard learned counsel, Mr. Abinash Kumar, for the petitioner and learned counsel, SC-15, on behalf of the State. Since the injunction order of the Trial Court dated 03.05.2013 has been confirmed by the Appellate Court in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 5 of 2013 on 29.01.2015 by recording findings that the plaintiffs-petitioners have got no prima facie

Patna High Court CWJC No.9374 of 2015 (2) dt.22-04-2016 2/2 case nor balance of convenience is not in their favour in supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the finding of fact arrived at by the Courts below cannot be interfered with. Thus, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) Mishra/- U