Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20676/2017bail granted

Ajit Kumar Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-04Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20676 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -295 Year- 2016 Thana -UDWANTNAGAR District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Ajit Kumar Srivastava, Son of Chadramala, resident of Village- Sahangi, P.S.- Agiaon (Garahani) District- Bhojpur at Ara. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) and 22(c) of the NDPS Act in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 295/2016.

The petitioner is main accused in the F.I.R. lodged under N.D.P.S. Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that F.I.R. itself shows that nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and he has remained in custody for more than six months and further submission is that one of the coaccused, having similar allegation, has been enlarged on bail vide

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20676 of 2017 (4) dt.04-07-2017 2/2 order dated 28.02.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3760/2017. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also. Having heard both sides, in view of the facts, stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Udwand Nagar P.S. Case No. 295/2016, subject to conditions that one of the bailors should be relative of the petitioner and another having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court below with further condition that he will co-operate in disposal of the trial and will make himself available before the court and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without any appropriate reason will be liable for cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) Rakhi U T