Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46917/2016disposed

Umakant Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-01-11Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46917 of 2016 ====================================================== Umakant Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh Son of Kamta Singh R/o Village- Wajitpur, P.S.- Tekari, Distt- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sunita Devi wife of Umakant Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh, D/o Sri Rameshwar Singh Resident of Village- Singhana, P.S.- Amba, DistrictAurangabad. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 11-01-2017 The present application has been filed for modification of order dated 22.06.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25773 of 2016, whereby the petitioner's anticipatory bail application in Complaint Case No. 924 of 2015 wherein processes have been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of learned SDJM, Aurangabad, was disposed of with a liberty to the learned court below to consider the prayer for bail of the petitioner on surrender within a period of six weeks in view of the ratio laid down in the case of Salim Ansare alias Md. Salim Ansare and others Vs. The State of Bihar & Another, reported in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46917 of 2016 (2) dt.11-01-2017 2/2 2015(3) PLJR, 806.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was to surrender within a period of six weeks but after eight days of the passing of the order by this Court on 30.06.2016 non-bailable warrant was issued. This Court is not inclined to entertain the modification application and revive the disposed of anticipatory bail application. However, in the circumstances, the petitioner will be at liberty to prefer anticipatory bail application before the learned Sessions Judge afresh.

Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T