Zohra Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2128 of 2017 (2) dt.23-01-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2128 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -134 Year- 2016 Thana -GAYA GRP CASE District- GAYA ====================================================== Zohra Khatoon Wife of Md. Aslam Sah Resident of VillageRudranagar(Banahi), P.S.- Sahpur, District- Bhojpur(Arra)..... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Gopesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 23-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sasram G.R.P. Case No. 134 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner was caught red handed when he snatched mangal sutra of the informant.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of circumstances, due to some dispute with the informant she has been implicated, resulting, she is suffering in custody since 28.11.2016.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named shall be released after completion of four months

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2128 of 2017 (2) dt.23-01-2017 custody from the date of his remand in this case on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Railway, Gaya in connection with Sasaram G.R.P. Case No. 134 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T