← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40809/2025bail granted

Arun Kumar Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-08Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40809 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2024 Thana- THAWE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Arun Kumar Jaiswal S/O Ram Nath Prasad Resident of village- Sihorwa, Police Station- Yadopur, district- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 295 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 309 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that, on the alleged date and time, when the informant was at his C.S.C., three persons came on the motorcycle out of which two entered the customer service center covering their face and, on the point of pistol, looted away cash amounting to Rs. 60,000/- and mobile phone of the informant and fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40809 of 2025(2) dt.08-07-2025 2/2 transpired in this case on the basis of his self-confessional statement. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the looted articles. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 10.03.2025 and has one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 295 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T