Rajesh @ Rakesh Yadav @ Rajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50916 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2020 Thana- BANDHUWA KURAWA District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

Rajesh @ Rakesh Yadav @ Rajesh Yadav Son of Ghanshyam Yadav Reisdent of Village- Bhaluabadhar, Police Station- Bandhuwa Kurawa, District- Banka.

2.

Pappu Yadav Son of Ghumman Mararr Reisdent of Village- Bhaluabadhar, Police Station- Bandhuwa Kurawa, District- Banka. 3.

Udeshwar Yadav Son of Mangal Yadav Resident of Village- Kurkutiya, Police Station- Bounsi, District- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyadeo Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(b) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioners are said to have killed the daughter of the informant by pressing her neck.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no evidence against the petitioners and only on suspicion the petitioners have been made accused in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50916 of 2021(3) dt.21-06-2022 2/2 husband of the deceased has been granted regular bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court. It is also submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners by submitting that processes under Section 82 and 83 have been issued against the petitioners.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

However, if petitioners surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T