Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42820/2024bail rejected

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-26Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42820 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2024 Thana- ISHUPUR BARAHAT District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR SON OF KAPIL MAHTO R/O VILL- RAJVAN, KISNICHAK, P.S.- ISHIPUR (BARAHAT), DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priyanshu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Ishipur (Barahat) P.S. Case No. 31 of 2024 dated 12.03.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have used to torture the informant's daughter due to which she committed suicide by hanging.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner never tortured the informant's daughter and he has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42820 of 2024(2) dt.26-06-2024 2/2 para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 13.03.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner who used to torture the informant's daughter due to which she committed suicide.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the specific and heinous nature of offence against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on bail.

7. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.

8. The application stands rejected.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T