Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30891/2017bail granted

Ram Vinod Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-27Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30891 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -275 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSITAMARHI ====================================================== Ram Vinod Rai, son of late Laxmi Rai, resident of Village- Fulparas, Police Station- Malangwa, District- Sarlahi (Nepal). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Alias Sanidh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Case No. C-2/275 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(A) of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act, 2016. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 9 litres of Nepali wine.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 8.5.2017 having clean antecedent. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30891 of 2017 (3) dt.27-07-2017 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional District and Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi, in connection with Case No. C-2/275 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U