Siku Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37372 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2020 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== SIKU KUMAR, son of late Jai Kishun Rai, Resident of village- Lalpokhar, Jagdishpur, P.S.- Sadar, Hajipur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within four weeks of normal functioning of the court, failing which the office is directed to place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case in brief is that the informant went to bank for taking money Rs.1,21,000/- situated at R.N. College, Hajipur by his motorcycle. Near the over bridge the informant was intercepted by four accused persons on two motorcycles and demanded the bag of money on the point of pistol. One of the accused made a firing over the informant but he narrowly escaped but the other persons snatched the said money bag with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37372 of 2020(3) dt.02-03-2021 2/2 mobile, two sim cards, Adhar card, PAN card etc. after that miscreants fled away.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and there is no T.I. Parade till date. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 02.06.2020.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that from perusal of the impugned order it is transpired that one passbook and one PAN card has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail after framing of the charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 264/2020 to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T