Intazul Haque v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27744 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2017 Thana -KISHANGANJ District- KISANGANJ ====================================================== Intazul Haque, son of Fateh Alam, Resident of Village+Post Sujali, P.S.- Islampur, District- Uttar Dinazpur, W.B.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 90 of 2017, registered under Sections 489(A) and 489(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is that on 28.02.2017, in the fare, petitioner purchased some articles and handed over a currency note of Rs. 2000/-, which was found fake currency, then informant searched his pocket and recovered fake 20 currency notes of Rs. 2000/-, thereafter, he was handed over of the Police. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a student having no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 01.03.2017. Further submission is that after investigation, the Chargesheet has also been submitted by the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27744 of 2017 (3) dt.02-08-2017 2/2 I.O, but it is not detected that whether the seized notes were fake or not.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 90 of 2017. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further he shall present the address of the petitioner in case of change of his address. The petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T