← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39980/2018bail granted

Sanjeev Roy And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39980 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2018 Thana -TARIYANI CHOWK District- SHEOHAR ======================================================

1. Sanjeev Roy, Son of Kishori Roy,

2. Bablu Roy @ Balu Kumar @ Babulal Roy, Son of Ram Babu Ray,

3. Upendra Roy, Son of Late Jamun Roy, All are resident of VillageSonbarsa, Purbi Tola, P.S.- Tariyani, District- Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar. null null .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Tariyani P.S.Case No. 58 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 342, 341, 323, 353, 414, 201 and 224 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is that the informant along with police officials after search the house of the co-accused persons, recovered two motorcycles from two other co-accused persons but they did not produce any papers and a seizure list was prepared and in the meantime, other accused persons including petitioners assembled there and set free the motorcycle and abused the informant and others and succeeded in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39980 of 2018 (3) dt.03-08-2018 2/2 getting the accused freed.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and the petitioners have not concerned with the alleged motorcycle and the petitioners have not any criminal antecedents. It is further submitted that the petitioners have not any criminal antecedents. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar in connection with Tariyani P. S. Case No. 58 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T