Ranjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51379 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-443 Year-2020 Thana- ISLAMPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== RANJAY SINGH S/o LATE LALDEV SINGH R/o VILLAGE-BALWAPAR, P.S-ISLAMPUR, DISTRICT-NALANDA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No.443 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a/25(1-A), 26A, 35 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, a semi made pistol, two empty .315 bore cartridge and instrument to build pistols have been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51379 of 2021(2) dt.06-05-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He have been falsely implicated in this case due to oblique reasons. Petitioner has neither been apprehended on the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern with the recovered articles. Petitioner has three criminal antecedent.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the recovery has been made from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail. The prayer for bail to the petitioner named above is rejected. The bail application is accordingly dismissed. However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass the order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T