← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28188/2017rejected

Arun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-19Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28188 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28188 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -265 Year- 2014 Thana -GOGRI District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Arun Yadav, son of Ajay Yadav, Resident of Village- Goraiya Bathan, P.S.- Gogri, District- Khagaria.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhitabh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected twice vide order dated 26.04.2016 and 26.10.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10208 of 2016 and 44340 of 2016 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 20.01.2016, other co-accused Ajay Yadav has been allowed bail vide B. A. No. 1211 of 2015 by the learned Sessions Judge itself.

Learned APP duly assisted by learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the injured has specifically stated that the petitioner shot him and the petitioner has got criminal antecedent also.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28188 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017 again his prayer for bail stands rejected.

However, considering the period of detention, learned court below is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which, the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T