Md. Zahid v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1993 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2019 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya ====================================================== Md. Zahid S/o Late Md. Arif R/o Village- Shadipur, P.S.- Chakand, DistrictGaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No. 140 of 2019 registered under Section 304 (B) of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is general and omnibus allegation against him.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that the petitioner is the husband of deceased. There is specific

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1993 of 2021(5) dt.28-10-2021 2/2 allegation of dowry and torture against the petitioner. Hence, petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J) utkarsh/- U T