Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41052/2025bail granted

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-17Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41052 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2024 Thana- BHIMPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav S/O Late Mahaveer Yadav Resident of Village-Sitapur, PS- Karjain, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 697/2024 arising out of Bhimpur P.S. Case No. 79/2024 dated 23.07.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 1377 litres of illicit Nepali country-made liquor was recovered from the Bolero.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not the owner of the said vehicle. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41052 of 2025(2) dt.17-07-2025 2/2 The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 16.12.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66069/2024. The petitioner has nine criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 21.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Supaul in connection with S.Tr. No. 697/2024 arising out of Bhimpur P.S. Case No. 79/2024 with the condition :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T