Patna Zila Sudhar Sammittee v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10307 of 2015 =========================================================== Patna Zila Sudhar Sammittee through its Secretary General, Rakesh Kapoor, Son of late Raghubir Prasad Khatri, resident of Mohalla Hari Mandir Gali, Patna City, Ps. Chowk, District Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The State of Bihar, through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Tourism, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Principal Secretary, Art Culture and Youth, Government of Bihar, Patna.
6. The Divisional Commissioner, Patna.
7. The District Magistrate, Patna.
8. The senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.
9. The sub Divisional Officer, Patna City, District Patna.
10. The Circle Officer, Patna Sadar, District Patna.
11. The Station House officer, Chowk Police station Patna City, District Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sushanta Kumar Das, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore, PAAG-I Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, AC to PAAG-I =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 17-01-2017 The petitioner has prayed for an order restraining the respondents from shifting the Chowk Thana, Telephone Exchange, Temple, Ittim Khana and others building intended to be shifted for celebrating 350th Birth Anniversary of Sri Guru Govind Singhji. The petitioner relies upon CWJC No.3853 of 2015 (Patna Zila Sudhar Samitee Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) wherein,
Patna High Court CWJC No.10307 of 2015 dt.17-01-2017 2/2 there was an ad interim order of not shifting Narayani Kanya Girls High School, Patna City. The said writ application has since been decided on 30th March, 2016 wherein, in the counter affidavit, the stand was that there was no decision to shift the school. Learned counsel for the State states that there is no decision to shift the buildings in question in the present writ application as well.
In view of the said facts, no further orders are called for in the present writ application. Disposed of. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Sunil AFR/NAFR N. A. F. R.
CAV DATE N. A.
Uploading Date 18.01.2017 Transmission Date