Vishnu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39428 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-622 Year-2025 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== Vishnu Yadav S/o Ram Pravesh Yadav R/o Village- Rajwari, P.SAurangabad( town ) District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the state.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No. 622 of 2025, for allegedly having committed offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352, 109(1) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution story, which has been lodged on the basis of the written report submitted by the informant to the effect that while the informant was standing near her door, co-accused Krishna Yadav started using filthy language against him. When the informant tried to stop Krishna Yadav then both
2/4 Krishna Yadav and his son Raushan Kumar assaulted the informant with an iron rod, due to which the informant fell down on the ground. It has been alleged that co-accused Raushan Kumar took away gold locket from the informant and in the meantime the petitioner herein took out Rs. 15,000/- from the pocket of the informant.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. He submits that the informant and the petitioner are agnate and there is a dispute in between the parties with regard to drainage for a long time. He submits that no allegation of assault is there against the petitioner and the only allegation against the petitioner is that he took out Rs. 15,000/- from the pocket of the informant. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that co-accused Raushan Kumar and Krishna Yadav, against whom allegation of assault is there, have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a Hon'ble single judge of this court, vide order dated 26.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. 12438 of 2026. He further submits that the petitioners have got a clean antecedent.
5. Per contra, the learned APP for the state opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
3/4
6. Having heard the rival submissions and after going through the records, it appears that the only allegation, which has been levelled against the petitioner is of taking away Rs. 15,000/- from the pocket of the informant. The allegation of assault is there against co-accused Krishna Yadav and Raushan Kumar, however, they have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a learned co-ordinate bench of this court vide Cr. Misc. 12438 of 2026. Considering the above, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender withing a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No. 622 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., with further condition:
(1)The learned Court concerned shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be
4/4 delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. (Ritesh Kumar, J) Krishnakant/- U T