Kalendra Paswan @ Pachrang Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39020 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2025 Thana- DARIGAON District- Rohtas ====================================================== Kalendra Paswan @ Pachrang Paswan, Son of Late Ram Ekbal Paswan, R/o Village- Karserua, P.S - Darigaon, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner, learned APP for the State as well as learned Advocate for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Darigaon P.S. Case No.44 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109(1), 76, 352, 351(2)(3) of the BNS.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is of ravishing and outraging modesty of the informant and on protest being made, she was also beaten by the petitioner.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that both the petitioner and the informant are gotiyas and on account of some trifle, the petitioner had beaten the informant and only in order to teach him a lesson, the present FIR has been instituted by making a concocted allegation of molesting and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39020 of 2025(4) dt.15-10-2025 2/3 outraging modesty, which is out and out incorrect and false. When the dispute came to be settled between the families, the informant has also filed a compromise petition, which also shows innocence of the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is a Government servant and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the Court.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State opposed the bail application. However, learned Advocate for the informant reiterated and reaffirmed the submissions made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner and also admitted the position of compromise.

6. Having considered the submissions set forth by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the relationship of the parties as also the fact that the petitioner is a Government servant having fair antecedent, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Darigaon P.S. Case No.44 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39020 of 2025(4) dt.15-10-2025 3/3 the BNSS, with following further conditions:

(i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

(ii) During subsistence of his bail, if the petitioner is made accused in any offence like this perpetrated against the informant or her family members, the same shall constitute breach of condition of bail entailing cancellation of bail bond(s). (Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U T