Prince Kumar @ Sahil v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41117 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2020 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== PRINCE KUMAR @ SAHIL S/o Ram Janam Rai R/o village- Dighi Kala West, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rohit Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-11-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence punishable u/s 332, 333, 353, 172, 174A, 414, 325/34, 33 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to delete the paragraph 10 of the bail application.

Permission is granted.

Allegedly, the accused persons named in F.I.R. including the petitioner tried to escape seeing the police personnel. All the alleged accused tried to flee away but three people were apprehended and one succeeded to flee away. Apprehended accused confessed that they are criminals and had committed loot-pat in bank and are involved in criminal activities.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41117 of 2022(2) dt.24-11-2022 2/2 been falsely implicated in this case due to political issues. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The petitioner has been made escape goat to save the real culprits. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the confessional statement of the apprehended accused. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that all the sections are triable before the learned Magistrate except section 333 of the IPC. Petitioner has four criminal antecedents.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no injury report, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No.354 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T