Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52417/2016rejected

Raju Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-18Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52417 of 2016 (3) dt.18-01-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52417 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -73 Year- 2015 Thana -HISUA District- NAWADA ====================================================== Raju Singh Son of Late Ratan Singh Resident of Village-Koshla, P.S.- Nardiganj (Nardiganj) District-Nawada .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 23.11.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35955 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 24.04.2015, the informant is not an eye witness, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, during trial four witnesses have been examined and they have not stated the name of the petitioner.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner has brutally assaulted the deceased which has come during investigation and still the informant and other witnesses are to be examined.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52417 of 2016 (3) dt.18-01-2017 petitioner, again his prayer for bail stands rejected in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 73 of 2015.

However, considering the period of detention, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after keeping the same on priority basis, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T