Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37360 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2019 Thana- TANKUPPA District- Gaya ====================================================== SANTOSH SINGH @ SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH, Son of Sri Ayodhya Singh, Resident of Village- Pipra, P.S.- Tankuppa, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Nikhil, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 24-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in Tankuppa P.S. Case No.14 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302, 120-B Indian Penal Code.
In the written report, it is alleged that on the date of occurrence accused Mukesh Kumar Singh has caused firearm injury to son of the informant. It is further alleged that petitioner and other accused persons were also present there and they also fired.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that witnesses in para 9, 10, 12 have stated that firing was made by Mukesh Kumar Singh.
Counsel for the petitioner further submits that co-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37360 of 2019(3) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 accused, Sunil Sao, has already been granted regular bail by coordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 11.07.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No.41904 of 2019.
Petitioner is in custody since 19.02.2019.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Gaya, in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No.14 of 2019, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T