← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22301/2017bail granted

Mantosh Kumar @ Mantosh Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-14Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22301 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2016 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Mantosh Kumar @ Mantosh Kumar Paswan, S/o Jawaharlal Paswan, Resident of Village- Tharha, P.S. K. Hat (Maranga), District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Tiwari, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 14-06-2017 Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The instant petition has been filed for grant of regular bail in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) PS case no.183 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 285, 307, 354(A), 504, 506/34 of Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is of declining to marry the victim girl after getting employment in C.I.S.F. It has been further alleged that the victim girl was set on fire by the petitioner causing burn injuries over various parts of her body. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 03.01.2017, the victim girl had suffered the burn injury on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22301 of 2017 (3) dt.14-06-2017 2/2 account of catching fire while cooking food, petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and above all, the matter had been settled and compromise petition has been filed before the trial court by the victim which has been taken note of in the impugned order dated 09.03.2017, passed by the learned trial court. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I find it a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the abovenamed petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Addl. Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge, Purnea in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) PS case no.183 of 2016.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J.) rinkee/- U T