Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54524/2016bail granted

Rajesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-21Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54524 of 2016 (2) dt.21-12-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54524 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -272 Year- 2013 Thana -KARAKAT District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Rajesh Sah, Son of Sri Ramsakal Sah, Resident of Village- Mangra, Police Station- Karakat (Gorari), in the District of Rohtas..... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier twice rejected vide order dated 20.01.2015 and 06.04.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35052 of 2014 and 47329 of 2015 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2014 and up-till now only four prosecution witnesses have been examined. The informant is still to be cross-examined, the Doctor and the I. O. are still to be examined. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded and the petitioner by remaining in custody now he has sufficiently been penalized and, as such, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54524 of 2016 (2) dt.21-12-2016 satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge VIII, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sessions Trial No. 861 of 2014 arising out of Karakat P.S. Case No. 272 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T