Pramod Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41006 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-164 Year-2021 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Pramod Tiwari Son Of Naga Tiwari Resident Of Village - Pakari, Police Station- Rajpur, District - Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Informant Mr. Samir Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects, if any, within three weeks. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per FIR, petitioner who is alleged to be the Sanchalak of Grahak Sewa Kendra of State Bank of India situated at Mauna Bazar, Nasriganj has embezzled Rs. 3,90,000/- deposited by the informant.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner had no knowledge that Amit Kumar has received the money. Amit Kumar used to visit the house of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41006 of 2022(5) dt.27-03-2023 2/2 informant because her son is his friend. He submits that alleged crime had been committed in the year 2018 by Amit Kumar Tiwary and FIR has been lodged in the year 2019. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 submit that large number of person have made complaint regarding fraud and embezzlement of their money by the petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is very serious and investigation is pending.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Nasariganj P.S. Case No. 164 of 2021. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T