Ram Dular Kharwar @ Ramdular @ Nawal Jee v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30913 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -51 Year- 2015 Thana -NAVHATTA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Ram Dular Kharwar @ Ramdular @ Nawal Jee, son of late Bisheshwar Kharwar, resident of village Salma, P.S. Nauhatta, District Rohtas at Sasaram.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Ahtash Ali Khan (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail which was earlier twice rejected vide order dated 18.05.2016 and 18.01.2017 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 14347 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 792 of 2017, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 23.09.2015 and up till now trial has not been concluded, only six prosecution witnesses have been examined and three witnesses are still to be examined. The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer by submitting that from possession of the petitioner fire arms and explosive substance were recovered and further he has got criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30913 of 2017 (2) dt.02-08-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of the bail, again prayer of the bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with S. Tr. No. 47 of 2016, arising out of Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 51 of 2015 pending in the court of learned A.D.J. 1st Rohtas at Sasaram.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same preferably within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after taking the same on priority basis, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T