Munilal Rajak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40405 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2019 Thana- KAJRAILICHAK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

MUNILAL RAJAK Son of Kishan Rajak Resident of Village - Kumrath Colony, P.S.- Kazraili, District - Bhagalpur. 2.

Ranjana Devi Wife of Munilal Rajak Resident of Village - Kumrath Colony, P.S.- Kazraili, District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhirendra Nath Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 28-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Kazraili P.S. Case No. 27/2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated on the accusation that the petitioner no. 1 assaulted the informant with khudal. No accusation of assault has been made against petitioner no. 2. It is submitted that no injury has been caused to anyone. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM XIV, Bhagalpur, in connection with Kazraili P.S. Case No. 27/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40405 of 2019(3) dt.28-08-2019 2/2 i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner no.1 shall remain physically present and the petitioner no. 2 shall be well represented in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T