Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29389/2017rejected

Shivbalak Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29389 of 2017 (2) dt.26-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29389 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2015 Thana -SARE District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Shivbalak Chaudhary Son of Late Chandar Chaudhry, Resident of VillageKhetalpura, Police Station- Sare, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Premchandra Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected twice vide order dated 23.02.2016 and 21.12.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39324 of 2015 and 54910 of 2016 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner being an old man is suffering in custody since 15.10.2015 having no specific allegation against him.

Learned APP submits that the petitioner is a convict under Section 302 IPC and again he has committed the same offence.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner, again his prayer for bail stands rejected in Sessions Trial No. 381

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29389 of 2017 (2) dt.26-07-2017 of 2016 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge III, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

However, considering the period of detention, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which, the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T