Dharmdeo Nut v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46378 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Rohtas ====================================================== DHARMDEO NUT SON OF LATE ROOPCHAND NUT VILLAGEBADIHAN, P.S.- NASRIGANJ, DISTT.- ROHTAS ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rakesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Excise Case No. 186/2024, arising out of Bikramganj Excise P.S. Case No. 27/2024 dated 01.03.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 400 m.l. of country made liquor was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46378 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 2/2 this case. The petitioner has eight criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 02.03.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Excise Case No. 186/2024, arising out of Bikramganj Excise P.S. Case No. 27/2024, with the condition:
(i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T